All right, if we're negotiating a settlement, I might want a little proviso especially for Booked, Loopy and me, since we are obviously the ringleaders of the peer pressure contingent. I think we should get a little *sumthin sumthin* extra. A PM, perhaps?
Hey what about the rest of us?
Umm..I'm throwing you under the bus in my attempt to feed my curiosity and live vicariously. Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.
well that sucks. I've never seen one either. Does that count for anything?
That's a question best directed to demaris.
I knew there were so many loopholes. Just tried to see where my plea could get me, nosey busybody that i am The court duly notes that in the defendant's rebuttal, the defendant did not give a "yes or no" reply to the question of whether the person of interest achieved a homerun. Nevertheless, the plaintiff grudgingly accepts the final settlement, in the hopes a) the defendant will show mercy and of her own accord volunteers/mentions PA in future postsb) a positive reply to the question will be given during the recount of the events that will transpire on the 23rd of June 2014 Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.
Very good point. Demaris? Care to drop your two cents in?
The defendant accepts the above proviso (A) ( mainly because, God bless you, Booked you got to be the most hopeless romantic I've come across in a long time 'live happily ever after'? Shiiiit) and agrees to, if the mood strikes volunteer information on PA. But reject proviso (B) as being totally TMI.No deal. Please refer back to post of the 10th June, mention was made of a 'cut' peen.....plaintiff made it clear uncut peens were not in favour.Refer to above reply.This settles the case of Twific Busybodies against Demaris aka Mrs Fassy. Thank bloody God Loopy Girl is clearly 'busy' with her own adventures this weekend so hasn't thrown her two cents in! Too late now!!KimKim I read Archer's Voice. Sweet. Still prefer Hopeless. It's a much better read than Leo or Leo's Chance so the author is clearly growing in skill.....Can't decide what I should read now.....
Regarding the discussion concerning circumsized vs, uncircumsized: Am I the only person here who ever read Playgirl Magazine (before it went out of business several years ago)? It definitely contained pictures of both for inquiring minds (and uninquiring minds). I think I hit my TMI quotient when 2 different people on Twilighted did Rob fics involving him finding out he was the father of an until then unknown child and one of the first questions out of his mouth regarding either son was when he asked if the kid had been circumsized and his relief when the answer was no. Even fictional Rob deserved some privacy.
Well, you can't blame us for trying Demaris.
You mean re-read TBH, right? I've re-read it a dozen times when I first got my hands on it, and without a break either, like, back to back! N.B: Nope just checked, Archer's Voice, same author ( I knew the author's name struck a cord), different story.... Leo and Leo's Chance are the books I'm thinking of.
KimKim I read Archer's Voice. Sweet. Still prefer Hopeless. It's a much better read than Leo or Leo's Chance so the author is clearly growing in skill.....Can't decide what I should read now.....
You've read TBH dozens of times? Wow. I felt like I was climbing Mount Everest when reading that book... Not sure I could repeat it and go through all that turmoil again. i thought maybe I'd read it and only skim all the parts that had me bawling before.Yep, you're referring to Leo... did you like those? I read Archer's Voice first and liked it so much that I read Leo soon after. I thought that was just dreadful. So much so that I never gave Leo's Chance a second though. The big surprise from book 1 was not even remotely a surprise... it all seemed just dumb and obvious to me. I found it hard to believe that it was the same author even.OK, so you liked it though? That's good enough for me... I was worried you might think it was awful like Leo. LOL I agree, Hopeless is better... but AV was as close as I've gotten in that genre. I'm still reading FIrst & Ten but took a break and am reading My Life Next Door which I'm enjoying.
I'm not sure I understand. Are you saying that an uncircumcised peen affords the peen some privacy? As in...some kind of skin 'helmet'? To which I'd have to ask WTF is it hiding? It's a peen for F***k sake it shouldn't be hiding anything and if it is, it would probably mean its something I should know about And how does fictional Rob's fictional son being circumcised or not, give fictional Rob any more or less privacy? Confused.com. For some circumcision is a religious matter, so that question would be pretty important. For me? I'm totally superficial, I just don't like the look of foreskin when peen is in repose.You have a TMI quota?...And you visit this thread? I'm surprised your head hasn't exploded.... I absolutely do not! In fact the last few pages has made me realise I've never met such a bunch of chancers! Honestly? Trying to sue me?! Shiiiit! Priceless. I flove you ladies.... Thank you for making me laugh real hard.
Loopy, now I'm wanting to reread it too. A friend of mine just read The Bronze Horseman series for the first time and hearing her gush over it has me wanting to read that one too. Loopy, did you read TBH?
Loopy Girl is in the house.....I can feel an appeal against the settlement coming...
LOL! But Loopy's already been with a guy with a PA. She has firsthand knowledge, unlike the rest of us. And you want TMI? Although my hubby refused to get a piercing, he was open to getting re-parka'd. Long story. Came out of a discussion with an author over whether with or without the jacket is better. It was interesting.
re-parka'd? they can do that? wow I had no idea.
Home
Search
Help
Login
Register
